On Tuesday, delegates to the Convention on Biological Diversity’s 24th meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA 24) continued discussions on the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Delegates then considered marine biodiversity, including ecologically or biologically significant marine areas (EBSAs), and initiated discussion on the programme of work of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). On the second day of discussion, a number of delegates asked for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework to consider the Aichi Targets and ensure consistency with the Convention’s objectives, as well as other international processes. Some expressed hope that the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 15) would reach a consensus on the monitoring framework, with the understanding that it could be improved on an ongoing basis.
On marine biodiversity, many delegates supported the protection of 30% of oceans. Some urged enhanced consideration of deep seabed mining, underwater noise, marine debris, and biodiversity mainstreaming in fisheries. Others asked for greater capacity-building initiatives, and increased knowledge and information sharing opportunities to support developing and small island developing states.
Some stressed the need for parties to collectively identify priority areas needing protection, including those meeting the EBSA criteria. Discussions touched upon differentiating between new and modifying existing EBSAs, potential disputes and overlap with other international regimes, and EBSAs that straddle areas within and beyond national jurisdiction. Many urged respect for the sovereign rights of parties and special consideration of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and consistency with the work of the Intergovernmental Conference on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). Several delegates supported extending the mandate of the informal advisory group on EBSAs with some asking to clarify the process for seeking advice from the advisory body, recommending a flexible structure.
Due to limited time, Chair Benitez invited observers to submit written statements. He established a contact group on marine biodiversity, to be co-chaired by Marie-May Muzungaile (Seychelles) and Matthias Steitz (Germany), and start its work on 10-11 May and present a CRP to plenary on 25 May.