The BMC clarified that only 6.51 hectare will be additionally reclaimed, as the remaining 14.49 hectare required is for the sea wall, which was already a part of the project but not detailed or mentioned in the 2017 application seeking CRZ clearence. The reclamation area appears to have increased by 14.49 ha. However, this area was there in the form of physical reclamation but not detailed (in the 2017 application), the BMC said in its application while justifying reclamation for the sea wall. The civic body, in the application, formally admitted there has been a change in alignment and design of the project. The modifications in the alignment and design of the MCRP-South (Mumbai Coastal Road Project) will not lead to any additional impacts on the environment, it added. The BMC has proposed to construct a 7.47-km sea wall along the proposed coastal road. The sea wall will provide an additional surface promenade of 11.66 hectare on the seaward side, it has stated. So far, it has reclaimed about 65 hectare. However, environmentalists and activists opposing the multi-crore project have requested the MCZMA to refuse permission for additional reclamation. We would like to remind the authority that granting post facto clearance has been prohibited by the Supreme Court. Already, BMC has violated CRZ clearance granted to it. We have pointed out the illegal reclamation of 4.25 hectare for the sea wall. The BMC itself had admitted in its affidavit before Supreme Court about starting work for the sea wall, said Debi Goenka of Conservation Action Trust, who attended the meeting on Wednesday. Goenka has submitted a 12-page letter to MCZMA highlighting the violations of the clearance granted to BMC. I have requested the authority to conduct a detailed site visit in the presence of representatives of all petitioners so that violations and facts can be verified, he said. Activist Shweta Wagh pointed out that since the BMC is now proposing changes in its original plan and there is additional reclamation, it should come up with a comprehensive plan. The sea wall was not part of the original plan for which CRZ clearance was granted. This additional work amounts to a change in the project profile. So, the BMC should make a fresh application for clearance, she added. Explained Activists say the additional reclamation would impact marine biodiversity and also have an effect on fishing areas in the vicinity. The CRZ clearance granted for the project in May 2017 was for only 90 hectare. A study by National Institute of Oceanography to find out the project’s impact on waves, high tide line and seashore was also conducted on an area of 90 hectare. Residents have pointed out that since there is a change in the original plan, BMC should again go for public consultation.